Ban the Box, Unless the Box Says ICE

Listen to this article now
POWERED BY DIGITAL PIZZA AUDIO
00:00 06:16
Reading Time: 5 minutes
Square editorial graphic titled "Ban the Box, Unless the Box Says ICE." The image is split into green and red halves. On the left, a silhouette labeled "Felony Record" appears beside text promoting Ban the Box and a sign reading "Second Chances Are Possible." On the right, a silhouette wearing an ICE cap is labeled "Federal Employee" beside text describing a new hiring restriction and a sign reading "Door Closed by Politics." A job application in the center asks about qualifications and includes a checkbox for prior ICE or CBP employment. Across the bottom, the graphic states, "In Montgomery County, you can overcome a felony, but you cannot overcome federal public service."
Profile photo of Jacob Silver
Jacob Silver Senior Contributor

I have filled out my share of job applications, and every one of them asked the same basic questions. Can you do the work? Can you manage a budget? Can you show up on time? Nobody asked where I used to work to decide whether I was a decent human being. The Montgomery County Council would like to change that.

Expedited Bill 29-26 carries a lovely name, the Community Trust in County Employees Act. Sponsored by Councilmember Kristin Mink and co-sponsored by Will Jawando, the Democratic nominee for county executive, it would bar public-facing county departments from hiring anyone who worked for Immigration and Customs Enforcement or Customs and Border Protection after October 1, 2025. Not people convicted of misconduct. Not people with a documented record of abuse. Anyone. Health and Human Services, Housing, Transportation, Corrections, Fire and Rescue, and even the police department. If you drew a federal paycheck from the wrong agency at the wrong time, the county’s door is closed.

The irony is breathtaking.

This is the same county that spent years championing its Ban the Box law, which forbids employers from asking about criminal arrests or convictions until after a conditional job offer. The theory was simple and, frankly, sympathetic. Judge people on their qualifications, not their past. Look at the individual first.

Yet now Councilmember Mink wants a new box, not for people convicted of crimes, but for people who served in a lawful federal agency. Under this bill, an applicant with a criminal conviction still gets an individualized review. A former ICE employee with a spotless record and years of commendations can be excluded categorically, sight unseen. Apparently, Ban the Box has an asterisk.

Make that logic work.

The message is unmistakable. In Montgomery County, you can overcome a felony, but you cannot overcome federal public service. Let’s call this what it is. The council is not weighing qualifications, training, or character. It is weighing one thing: the name of your former employer. That is not a hiring standard. That is a political loyalty test dressed up in the language of trust.

“In Montgomery County, you can overcome a felony, but you cannot overcome federal public service.”

Think about what this says to a real applicant. A veteran who processed paperwork at a federal desk, enforcing laws Congress wrote and funded, is now too tainted to inspect a restaurant in Rockville or drive a Ride On bus. The council has not accused this person of anything. It did not have to. The agency’s name on a resume is conviction enough.

The contradiction gets worse when you remember that Montgomery County cannot fill the public safety jobs it already has. The police department has struggled for years to meet hiring goals. At the very moment when experienced officers are hardest to recruit, the council proposes to intentionally shrink the applicant pool. Esther Wells, the Republican candidate for county executive and an immigrant herself, stood alone in testifying against the bill at the July hearing, arguing that real community trust comes from safe neighborhoods and fully staffed departments. She was right, and she was outnumbered.

Even the lawyers are wincing. Joyce Smithey, who chairs the Labor and Employment Section of the Maryland State Bar Association, noted that while prior employment is not a protected class, the bill’s sheer breadth could make it harder to defend in court, and predicted someone might sue simply to make a statement. The county’s reward for this exercise may be a courtroom, billed to you and me.

Councilmember Mink has essentially conceded the point, acknowledging that a narrower bill targeting specific abusive conduct would not work because work histories can be hidden, and desk employees support enforcement, too. Read that again. The bill sweeps in the file clerks on purpose. When precision is inconvenient, punish everybody. That is not lawmaking. That is a dragnet. And it is spreading. Prince George’s County passed a similar ban in April, and copycats have surfaced in Annapolis, California, and New Jersey.

Here is the part that gets me. The stated goal, encouraging immigrant families to use county services, is perfectly reasonable. But no one has explained how blacklisting a retired federal desk worker accomplishes it. The fear residents feel flows from federal immigration policy, which the council does not control. County hiring is what it controls, so that is where it swings the hammer. It is symbolism, and expensive symbolism, while crime, schools, housing costs, and a strained budget wait their turn.

Government hiring should rest on one question. Who is the most qualified person for the job? That was the whole idea behind the merit system, and it protected everyone, Democrat and Republican, citizen and immigrant alike. Once a council starts deciding which lawful prior employment disqualifies you from public service, every resident should ask the obvious follow-up. Whose resume gets blacklisted next?

The council holds its work session on this bill in October. That is plenty of time to shelve it. Hire the best people. Judge them on what they can do, not on where they once worked. It is a simple principle. It is also, apparently, a controversial one in Rockville.


ENDNOTES

1. Montgomery County Council, introduction of Expedited Bill 29-26, the Community Trust in County Employees Act (June 2026). https://www.montgomerycountymd.gov/news/montgomery-county-council-meets-june-16-introduce-five-bills-conduct-12-public-hearings-commemorate-pride-month

2. WTOP News, “Montgomery Co. council considers barring ICE and Border Patrol officers from certain county jobs” (July 2026). https://wtop.com/montgomery-county/2026/07/a-bill-restrict-montgomery-county-from-hiring-former-immigration-officers-gets-a-hearing/

3. Bethesda Today, “Council considers bills to deny county jobs to federal immigration agents” (July 15, 2026). https://bethesdamagazine.com/2026/07/15/council-deny-county-jobs-federal-immigration-agents/

4. Montgomery Community Media, “Council hears bill to limit hiring of former immigration officers” (July 2026). https://www.mymcmedia.org/council-hears-bill-to-limit-hiring-of-former-immigration-officers/

5. DC News Now, “Prince George’s County leaders pass immigration protection measures limiting ICE enforcement” (April 2026). https://www.dcnewsnow.com/news/local-news/maryland/prince-georges-county/prince-georges-county-leaders-pass-immigration-protection-measures-limiting-ice-enforcement/

6. Montgomery County Office of Human Rights, “Ban the Box: Fair Criminal Record Screening Standards Law”. https://www.montgomerycountymd.gov/humanrights/ban-the-box/index.html

About The Author

Scroll to Top